Literature review

Introduction:

Telemedicine has surfaced as a revolutionary method for providing healthcare, utilizing digital technologies to deliver remote medical services. Although telemedicine provides many advantages, such as better access to healthcare and improved patient self-management, its incorporation into clinical practice poses considerable challenges, especially regarding legal and ethical considerations. The rising adoption of active telemedicine systems—which entail direct, real-world interactions with users without any human intervention—intensifies worries surrounding patient safety, data protection, and accountability.

A developing collection of research points out the dangers and legal intricacies tied to the adoption of telemedicine. Research stresses the importance of adhering to regulations to reduce risks such as misdiagnosis, data breaches, and accountability issues in patient care (Rosenbaum, 2021; McGonigle and Mastrian, 2022). Furthermore, worries regarding defensive medicine—where medical practitioners take excessively cautious measures to evade liability—can obstruct the broad implementation of cutting-edge telemedicine solutions (Adler-Milstein et al., 2014).

Historical Context:

The development of digital health integration and interoperability has been influenced by technological progress, legislative modifications, and the growing demand for effective health information exchange. During the early 20th century, healthcare documentation was mainly paper based, resulting in considerable obstacles to information accessibility and coordination (Collen, 1995). The transition to electronic health records (EHRs) commenced in the late 20th century, motivated by the necessity for enhanced efficiency and data management.

The onset of Health Level Seven (HL7) standards in the 1980s sought to standardize the exchange of healthcare data, yet widespread acceptance was sluggish due to the fragmented nature of healthcare systems (Braunstein, 2018). The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) enacted in 1996 was significant legislation that established national standards for electronic healthcare transactions while safeguarding patient privacy (Gostin and Hodge, 2002). Nevertheless, as indicated by Califf and Muhlbaier (2003), HIPAA also brought about complications for clinical research by introducing additional bureaucratic obstacles, thus complicating data-sharing.

Although HIPAA aims to protect patient information, worries regarding the limiting data-sharing policies and their effect on medical research surfaced. The enactment of the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act in 2009 also sped up EHR adoption by offering financial rewards to healthcare providers (Adler-Milstein and Jha, 2017). HITECH spotlighted interoperability and encouraged the establishment of Regional Health Information Organizations (RHIOs) to enhance data sharing among providers (Blumenthal and Tavenner, 2010).

The 21st Century Cures Act (2016) additional addressed interoperability by banning data blocking and advancing Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR), a contemporary standard intended to improve smooth data exchange (Mandel et al., 2016). Despite these initiatives, interoperability is still not fully realized because of uneven adoption of standards, cybersecurity issues, and opposition from industry participants (Rosenbaum, 2021).

Challenges: 

Fragmented Health Information Systems In numerous healthcare environments, different systems are utilized for multiple functions like patient registration, electronic health records (EHRs), and laboratory information. This fragmentation results in data silos, obstructing smooth information exchange and thorough patient care.

Lack of Standardization The lack of uniform data formats, coding systems, and terminologies presents a major obstacle to interoperability. In the absence of shared standards, merging data from various sources proves difficult, leading to disjointed and incomplete health information.

Privacy and Security Issues Ensuring the privacy and security of data while enabling integration is intricate. The growing prevalence and advanced nature of cyberattacks amplify the threat of data breaches, resulting in possible financial losses, legal complications, and a decline in patient trust.

High Implementation Costs The monetary obligations linked to the integration of diverse health information systems can be significant. Expenses concerning system enhancements, procurement of new technologies, and employee training may discourage healthcare organizations, especially in low- and middle-income nations, from seeking interoperability projects.

Regulatory and Policy Barriers Complex regulatory landscapes and inadequate policy coordination can hinder health innovation. Fragmented policies and a cautious culture within healthcare institutions may obstruct the implementation and expansion of innovative solutions essential for interoperability.

Innovation Solutions:

FHIR (Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources): The adoption of FHIR has transformed the sharing of healthcare data. FHIR enables smooth transmission of electronic health information (EHI) through contemporary web-based APIs. This standard provides immediate access to clinical data across different systems, greatly enhancing the availability of patient information and minimizing the time required to manage intricate legacy data formats. As Don Rucker emphasizes, FHIR-based technologies strengthen the digital health economy by facilitating real-time applications for both healthcare providers and patients. (Miller, G., & Miller, G. (2024, September 10).

Integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) AI technologies are utilized to improve interoperability and data sharing by standardizing various data elements for smooth integration. These innovations allow for the development of complete longitudinal patient records, enhancing both accessibility and quality of care. (Miller, G., & Miller, G. (2024, September 10).

Implementation of Interoperability Frameworks Frameworks such as the Trusted Exchange Framework and Common Agreement (TEFCA) strive to establish a national network of networks for health information exchange, facilitating data flow among different healthcare systems. This initiative aims to standardize the practices of data exchange, encouraging interoperability on a wider scale. (Miller, G., & Miller, G. (2024, September 10).

Development of Digital Therapeutic Digital therapeutics, including mental health applications, give patients increased authority over their care and present clinicians with additional choices apart from conventional techniques. These innovations connect with current healthcare frameworks, encouraging interoperability and improving patient involvement. (Fearn, N. (2025a, February 5).

Utilization of Cloud-Based Solutions Cloud-based platforms provide adaptable and scalable solutions for the storage and sharing of data, facilitating interoperability by offering centralized access to health information. These platforms allow healthcare organizations to incorporate different systems and applications, improving data accessibility and collaboration. (Fearn, N. (2025a, February 5).

Blockchain for Secure Data Exchange Blockchain technology guarantees secure and transparent transactions in the exchange of healthcare data. By creating a secure, unchangeable ledger for transactions, blockchain safeguards sensitive healthcare information while improving the reliability of data sharing. (Miller, G., & Miller, G. (2024, September 10).

Conclusion:

Telemedicine provides considerable advantages like enhanced access and patient self-management, yet it encounters difficulties concerning legal, ethical, and technical matters, including misdiagnosis, data breaches, and accountability issues. The development of digital health and interoperability, propelled by regulatory initiatives such as HIPAA and the HITECH Act, has benefited healthcare data exchange but still confronts challenges like fragmented systems and security threats. Cutting-edge solutions like FHIR, AI, cloud platforms, digital therapeutics, and blockchain are vital for addressing these challenges, improving data sharing, and promoting patient care. Ongoing regulatory coordination and technological unification will be crucial for progressing telemedicine and interoperability in the healthcare sector.

​References: 

1. Parimbelli E, Bottalico B, Losiouk E, Tomasi M, Santosuosso A, Lanzola G, Quaglini S, Bellazzi R. Trusting telemedicine: A discussion on risks, safety, legal implications and liability of involved stakeholders. Int J Med Inform. 2018 Apr; 112:90-98. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.01.012. Epub 2018 Jan 31. PMID: 29500027. Trusting telemedicine: A discussion on risks, safety, legal implications and liability of involved stakeholders - PubMed

2. Willerson, J. T., & Kereiakes, D. J. (2003). Clinical research and future improvement in clinical care. Circulation, 108(8), 919–920. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000089331.82015.46

3. A history of medical informatics in the United States, 1950 to 1990: Collen, Morris F. (Morris Frank), 1913-2014: Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive. (1995). Internet Archive. https://archive.org/details/historyofmedical0000coll

4. Braunstein, M. L. (2018). Health Informatics: An Interprofessional Approach. Elsevier.

5. Gostin LO, Hodge JG. Personal privacy and common goods: a framework for balancing under the national health information privacy rule. Minn Law Rev. 2002 Jun;86(6):1439-79. PMID: 15174439.

6. Adler-Milstein J, Jha AK. HITECH Act Drove Large Gains in Hospital Electronic Health Record Adoption. Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Aug 1;36(8):1416-1422. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1651. PMID: 28784734. HITECH Act Drove Large Gains InHospital Electronic Health Record Adoption - PubMed

7. Blumenthal, D., & Tavenner, M. (2010). The. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-%22meaningful-use%22-regulation-for-electronic-Blumenthal-Tavenner/7cb992e7373c5b797d5e76bbfb11035008f1afb3#related-papers

8. Jayatissa, P. (2023). Enhancing Interoperability among Health Information Systems in Low and Middle-Income Countries: A Review of Challenges and Strategies. Cmb. https://www.academia.edu/107923301/Enhancing_Interoperability_among_Health_Information_Systems_in_Low_and_Middle_Income_Countries_A_Review_of_Challenges_and_Strategies

9. Fearn, N. (2025, February 5). ‘Security is vital’: how should new health innovations protect user data – and put it to good use? The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/the-dawn-of-digital-therapeutics/2025/jan/03/security-is-vital-how-should-new-health-innovations-protect-user-data-and-put-it-to-good-use

10. Hughes, L. (2024, November 28). Regulation and ‘poor alignment’ are stymying health innovation, says report. Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/b4dd8b0a-5328-454b-8657-769b02852dee

11. Miller, G., & Miller, G. (2024, September 10). Enhancing Interoperability and Data Sharing with Innovative Technologies and Standards | Healthcare IT Today. Healthcare IT Today | Fresh, Daily, Practical Healthcare IT Insights. https://www.healthcareittoday.com/2024/09/10/enhancing-interoperability-and-data-sharing-with-innovative-technologies-and-standards

12. Scalable healthcare Interoperability Solutions | InterSystems. (n.d.). US Corporate. https://www.intersystems.com/use-cases/healthcare-interoperability/?

13. Fearn, N. (2025a, February 5). I recovered from depression – and went on to help create a mental health app. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/the-dawn-of-digital-therapeutics/2025/jan/03/i-recovered-from-depression-and-went-on-to-help-create-a-mental-health-app